Selling a business is a significant financial and emotional milestone. Proper preparation, professional and peer advice, as well as strategic execution, are essential to achieving the best outcome. Take the time to define your objectives, evaluate your options, and ensure the process aligns with your goals for the future. In this article, we will cover the following topics:
- Motivations of selling and personal assessment, your role going forward?
- Deciding on a goal, time-based metric or other trigger point.
- Alternatives to selling – family succession, hiring an executive, IPO, strategic partners, alternative investors
- Advisers and service providers
As a first step in deciding what exit path to take, you will need to better understand your motivations for selling. A self assessment may help clarify the primary goal. And a clearer understanding of the goal will help you to determine if selling is the correct strategy to achieve the goal (or if hiring an Operator, for example, might better address the goal).Understanding what you want to achieve from the sale or investment is critical. Key considerations include:
- Maximizing Valuation?
- Access to Capital for growth capital or operational improvements?
- Retaining Ownership and Simply Partnering with an Investor?
- Strategic vs. Financial Buyer: Decide whether you prefer a PE firm’s financial expertise or the industry-specific synergies a strategic buyer might offer.
- Exit Timeline?
- What is most important to you? Protection of employees? Maximum price? Your continued involvement? Long-term viability? Rapid enhancement in which you could share in the upside? Something else?
- Is the decision more the result of an acknowledged lack of motivation in certain aspects of running the company – an understanding that the company and its employees might deserve more focused attention? Are you selling because of burnout or financial problems? Sometimes the river is simply the realization that you have lost the drive and passion to forge ahead.
- Are you trying to solve for a lack of knowledge or expertise by selling to someone with specific skills or expertise? What roles do you expect a buyer/investor to take on?
- Are you hoping to ensure a legacy for yourself or continued opportunities for employees? What are your top non-financial goals and hopes for the Company?
- How many more years do you want (or are you willing) to work in the company? And how many years would you work as a consultant to the company?
- Are you looking for a new business challenges elsewhere
- Are you expecting to retire – perhaps focused on travelling more or spending more time with family? Are you more focused on providing yourself with more free time or to pursue hobbies?
- Are you selling because of concerns about a competitive threat?
- What are the ideal characteristics of a buyer?
- What is your ideal timeline for a potential transaction?
- Could your business grow more rapidly, take advantage of more opportunities and withstand downturns in demand better, with a financial or strategic partner?
- How much money will you need (or do you want) in cash as the result of a transaction)?
Types of Acquirers (and other options)
There are generally two types of buyers: financial and strategic. Financial buyers (such as private equity groups) are opportunistic, and are looking for a good deal, ways to increase the value efficiently after acquiring, and want comfort that there are minimal risks to the business’ viability such that an exit in three-to-five years will be possible. Financial buyers typically need to convince lenders that your business, and their investment thesis, are investment-worthy. In other words, they rely on leverage to finance their deals.
Private equity and other financial buyers are typically very sophisticated buyers because acquisitions are what they live and breathe every day. They typically have deep pockets for future investments in the business, and are determined to increase value. Partnering with financial buyers and rolling over some equity as an investment in the business going forward may facilitate significant financial upside potential. In addition, PE may cause less disruption to the business as a stand-alone entity that strategic acquirers would.
Financial acquirers, however, do bring some downsides. Your ongoing involvement may be required, at a high level of engagement. Financial buyers do lever up the business, meaning that it may be saddled with debt, which could be hard to pay down in a downturn. Financial acquirers typically pay less than financial buyers.
If selling to a private equity (PE) group doesn’t align with your goals or circumstances, several alternative exit strategies or capital-raising options can achieve similar outcomes, depending on your priorities. These alternatives vary based on whether you’re seeking liquidity, growth capital, or a complete exit. Here’s a breakdown:
1. Selling to a Strategic Acquirer
Description: A strategic acquirer is another company (often in the same or a complementary industry) that sees value in acquiring your business to achieve synergies or expand its offerings. Typically, bidders who see synergy (geographic footprint, customer type, product fit) will value your business higher than those who do not.
Pros:
- Potentially higher valuation due to strategic synergies (e.g., cost savings, market share gains).
- Access to greater resources for employees and operations post-acquisition.
- A clearer path for long-term integration and growth.
- May be more likely to allow the seller to walk away from the business entirely
- May provide career training and enhancement for employees
- There is the potential for operating synergies
- Longer-term vision of the future
Cons:
- Your company may lose its identity as it is integrated into the buyer’s operations.
- Employees may face changes or redundancies.
- Potential cultural misalignment with the acquirer.
- Customers may not embrace the acquisition
- Enhanced bureaucratic issues in a larger organization
- The suitors may be your competitors, which means that their diligence opens up your kimono to the enemy.
Strategic acquirers look for synergies in the form of:
- Customer base
- Channel access
- Market access
- Geographic diversification
- Access to new brands to sell
- Growth opportunities
- Elimination of a competitor – market share gins
- Talent in the form of human capital
- Intellectual property
- Economies of scale – reduced operating expenses through efficiencies
2. Selling to a Family Office
Description: Family offices are private investment entities managing the wealth of high-net-worth families, often looking for long-term, steady returns.
Pros:
- Long-term investment horizon with less pressure for a quick exit.
- Greater flexibility in deal structure and operational involvement.
- Cultural and value alignment can sometimes be better than with PE firms.
Cons:
- Less industry-specific expertise compared to some PE firms.
- May lack the operational resources to scale your business.
3. Management Buyout (MBO)
Description: In an MBO, your company’s management team acquires ownership, often with external financing from banks or private investors.
Pros:
- Continuity in leadership and vision.
- Provides liquidity for the owner while keeping the business in trusted hands.
- Easier to maintain company culture and retain employees.
Cons:
- Financing can be challenging for management teams to secure.
- Growth may be constrained without additional external capital.
- Risks arise if the management team lacks experience in ownership transitions.
4. Selling to an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)
Description: An ESOP involves selling your company to employees through a trust, creating an employee-owned business.
Pros:
- Preserves company legacy and fosters employee loyalty.
- Significant tax advantages for the seller and the company.
- Provides liquidity while maintaining the business’s independence.
Cons:
- Complex and expensive to set up and administer.
- Requires a stable financial base for the business to thrive under employee ownership.
- Limited growth capital compared to PE or strategic buyers.
5. Initial Public Offering (IPO)
Description: Taking your company public by offering shares to investors on a stock exchange.
Pros:
- Provides significant liquidity and can raise substantial growth capital.
- Enhances brand recognition and credibility.
- Retains some control while allowing you to capitalize on market enthusiasm.
Cons:
- High costs and regulatory requirements.
- Increased scrutiny and accountability to shareholders.
- Market volatility can affect timing and valuation.
6. Recapitalization
Description: A recap involves restructuring your company’s capital (e.g., taking on debt or bringing in minority equity investors) to provide liquidity without a full sale.
Pros:
- Allows owners to take money off the table while retaining control.
- Brings in financial partners who support growth without complete ownership transfer.
- Flexible structures tailored to specific business needs.
Cons:
- Increased debt can add financial risk.
- May not provide as much liquidity as a full sale.
- Minority investors may still require governance influence.
7. Keeping the Business and Passing it Down
Description: Retain ownership and pass the business to family members or key employees over time.
Pros:
- Preserves the family or legacy aspect of the business.
- Minimizes disruption to operations and employees.
- Provides a gradual transition, allowing the owner to retain involvement.
Cons:
- Requires careful planning to ensure successors are capable.
- May not generate immediate liquidity for the owner.
- Family conflicts or lack of interest may arise.
8. Venture Capital or Growth Equity
Description: Raise capital from venture capital (VC) or growth equity firms that specialize in scaling businesses without taking full ownership.
Pros:
- Provides growth capital while allowing you to maintain control.
- Access to experienced investors and strategic advice.
- Flexible structures depending on the investor’s approach.
Cons:
- Pressure for aggressive growth and eventual exit (e.g., IPO or sale).
- Dilution of ownership stake.
- May involve significant reporting and governance requirements.
9. Selling to a Competitor
Description: Selling to a direct competitor, often for market share or consolidation purposes.
Pros:
- Likely to understand your industry and offer fair market value.
- Potential for synergies that benefit both businesses.
Cons:
- Sharing proprietary information during negotiations can be risky.
- Post-sale dynamics may lead to changes in operations or layoffs.
- Potential backlash from customers or employees.
10. Retaining Ownership and Growing Organically
Description: Choose to retain ownership, reinvesting profits to grow the business over time.
Pros:
- Maintains full control and independence.
- Allows for steady, long-term growth without external interference
Cons:
- Growth may be slower without external capital or resources.
- Owner bears all the risk.
- Limited liquidity options in the short term.
Conclusion
The right exit approach for you depends on your priorities, whether they are liquidity, growth, legacy preservation, or maintaining control. Each option carries its own risks and benefits, so it’s essential to consult experienced advisors to explore the most suitable path for your unique situation. More important than price is a sense of alignment between your goals and objectives and the sellers’ intentions.
You should also prepare yourself for the fact that approximately 75 percent of deals that make it to the due diligence stage do not close. Here are some common reasons:
- Lack of sufficient data, particularly around the numbers
- Emotional stressors
- Seller feeling insulted or made to feel “stupid”
- Buyer skill in conducting diligence and comfort with ambiguity
- Access to staff and data
- Buyer strategy – to walk away in hopes of negotiating a better deal